This page (revision-132) was last changed on 18-Apr-2021 19:04 by JianSun

This page was created on 18-Apr-2007 17:40 by Administrator

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
132 18-Apr-2021 19:04 3 KB JianSun to previous
131 08-Jul-2010 15:35 4 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
130 06-Jul-2010 18:47 4 KB RonYurow to previous | to last
129 06-Jul-2010 16:24 4 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
128 06-Jul-2010 16:23 4 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
127 28-Jun-2010 19:33 4 KB RonYurow to previous | to last
126 28-Jun-2010 19:31 4 KB RonYurow to previous | to last
125 23-Jun-2010 19:47 4 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
124 14-Jun-2010 15:32 3 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
123 20-May-2010 12:06 3 KB JianSun to previous | to last add one more link to EIS Spectral Atlases
122 20-May-2010 12:04 4 KB JianSun to previous | to last
121 20-May-2010 12:03 4 KB JianSun to previous | to last add link to EIS Spectral Atlases files

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links
DataProAnalysis
DataProAnalysis

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 4 removed one line
Absolute Calibaration and /NOABS Keyword
At line 6 removed 14 lines
%%(text-align:justify;)
We have run 40 " slot time-series data. Once we run the eis_prep with /noabs
keyword then we get the Intensity in 'DN' units. While, when we run the
same with absolute calibaration (without /noabs keyword), we get the intensity in absolute
cgs unit.However, this is surprising that when we are plotting intensities
with time, we are getting the different patterns of variations in the above mentioned
two cases. This is affecting our further analysis and also confuses which one we have
to choose. Either DNs one or absolute one ?? !!!!
Why they are giving different pattern?. There should only be the
difference in magnitude. why the pattern is also varying. Which one we have to choose for our further analysis ?
Is it here any problem with absolute calibaration of EIS ?
Please suggest !%%
At line 47 added 16 lines
*[Absolute Calibaration and /NOABS Keyword]
%%(text-align:justify;)
We have run 40 " slot time-series data. Once we run the eis_prep with /noabs
keyword then we get the Intensity in 'DN' units. While, when we run the
same with absolute calibaration (without /noabs keyword), we get the intensity in absolute
cgs unit.However, this is surprising that when we are plotting intensities
with time, we are getting the different patterns of variations in the above mentioned
two cases. This is affecting our further analysis and also confuses which one we have
to choose. Either DNs one or absolute one ?? !!!!
Why they are giving different pattern?. There should only be the
difference in magnitude. why the pattern is also varying. Which one we have to choose for our further analysis ?
Is it here any problem with absolute calibaration of EIS ?
Please suggest !%%
This page (revision-132) was last changed on 18-Apr-2021 19:04 by JianSunTop