This page (revision-23) was last changed on 28-Aug-2023 22:31 by Peter Young

This page was created on 26-Jul-2007 22:00 by Mike Smith

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
23 28-Aug-2023 22:31 4 KB Peter Young to previous
22 11-Jul-2023 17:09 4 KB akadojewu to previous | to last
21 03-Nov-2016 18:34 6 KB utijeyer to previous | to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links
EisDiscussion
EisDiscussion

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 31 changed one line
It has been noted that Fe VIII and Si VII rasters look nearly identical [(Young et al. 2007)|http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PASJ...59S.857Y] but the temperature of formation for the two ions are seperated by about 0.2 dex. This image illustrates this by comparing Mg, Si, and Fe images in this temperature range. These data suggest that the Fe VIII and perhaps Fe IX are formed at higher temperatures than suggested by the ionization balance calculations of [Mazzotta et al. (1998)|http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A%26AS..133..403M].
It has been noted that Fe VIII and Si VII rasters look nearly identical [(Young et al. 2007)|http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PASJ...59S.857Y] but the temperature of formation for the two ions are separated by about 0.2 dex. This image illustrates this by comparing Mg, Si, and Fe images in this temperature range. These data suggest that Fe VIII and perhaps Fe IX are formed at higher temperatures than suggested by the ionization balance calculations of [Mazzotta et al. (1998)|http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A%26AS..133..403M].
At line 37 added 2 lines
An explanation for this observation is given by [Brooks, Warren, and Young (2011)|http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...730...85B].
This page (revision-23) was last changed on 28-Aug-2023 22:31 by Peter YoungTop