This page (revision-43) was last changed on 18-Apr-2021 19:03 by JianSun

This page was created on 24-Apr-2008 18:38 by JianSun

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
43 18-Apr-2021 19:03 5 KB JianSun to previous
42 02-May-2008 17:30 5 KB JianSun to previous | to last
41 01-May-2008 03:17 5 KB David R Williams to previous | to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links
CompressionFactorStudy
CompressionFactorStudy

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 1 changed one line
The compression rate of onboard EIS data may vary depending on a few factors such as the observing target (QS, AR, CH, etc), slit/slot selection, exposures, etc.
The compression rate of on board EIS data may vary depending on a few factors such as the observing target (QS, AR, CH, etc), slit/slot selection, exposures, etc.
At line 3 changed one line
The purpose of this study is trying to investigate how different compression schemes effect EIS data volume onboard and work out a better estimation of compression rate for compression scheme (eg. DPCM, JPEG98, JPEG95, etc.)
The purpose of this study is trying to investigate how different compression schemes effect EIS data volume on board and work out a better estimation of compression rate for compression scheme (eg. DPCM, JPEG98, JPEG95, etc.)
At line 5 added one line
The approach:
At line 7 added 2 lines
1. to get actual data volume from MDP status information: the inclined curve means data packets from EIS on MDP, the vertical curve means data packets dumped to ground station. So in general, known a raster's start and end time can calculate actual data volume, and then compare it with the designed data volume of this raster to get data compression rate.
At line 11 added one line
2. to get related information from planning database/eis catalogue/fits header, for example: raster ID, compression scheme, designed data volume, SCI_OBJ, TARGET, slit/slot, exposures, etc.
At line 13 added 35 lines
3. prepare plots based on various factor combinations: compression rate vs. slit/slot, rate vs. target, rate vs. exposures
----
Some preliminary results (plots):\\
(The investigation here is for dates between %%(color:#cc0000;)2007-Sep-15 and 2007-Dec-15%%, as EIS is operationally stable over this duration.)
%%tabbedSection
%%tab-DPCM
%%(text-align:center)
DPCM compression (all samples)
%%
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_only.gif}]
%%center DPCM compression vs different target:%%
DPCM vs. QS
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_QS_only.gif}]
%%
%%tab-SecondTab
This is the second tab
%%
%%tab-ThirdTab
This is the third tab
%%
%%
This page (revision-43) was last changed on 18-Apr-2021 19:03 by JianSunTop