This page (revision-43) was last changed on 18-Apr-2021 19:03 by JianSun

This page was created on 24-Apr-2008 18:38 by JianSun

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
43 18-Apr-2021 19:03 5 KB JianSun to previous
42 02-May-2008 17:30 5 KB JianSun to previous | to last
41 01-May-2008 03:17 5 KB David R Williams to previous | to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links
CompressionFactorStudy
CompressionFactorStudy

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 1 changed 3 lines
[{ALLOW edit EISMainUsers}]
[{ALLOW view Anonymous}]
The __compression factor__ of on board EIS data may vary depending on a few factors such as the observing target (QS, AR, CH, etc), slit/slot selection, exposures, etc.
The compression rate of on board EIS data may vary depending on a few factors such as the observing target (QS, AR, CH, etc), slit/slot selection, exposures, etc.
At line 5 changed one line
The purpose of this study is trying to investigate how different compression schemes effect EIS data volume on board (MDP) and work out a better estimation of compression factor for compression scheme (eg. DPCM, JPEG98, JPEG95, etc.)
The purpose of this study is trying to investigate how different compression schemes effect EIS data volume on board and work out a better estimation of compression rate for compression scheme (eg. DPCM, JPEG98, JPEG95, etc.)
At line 7 changed one line
!The approach:
The approach:
At line 9 changed one line
1. to get actual data volume from MDP status information: the inclined curve means data packets from EIS on MDP increasing, the vertical curve means data packets dumped to ground station. So in general, knowing a raster's start and end time one can fitstly calculate actual data volume in that duration, and then compare it with the designed data volume in raster's definition, to get data compression factor.
1. to get actual data volume from MDP status information: the inclined curve means data packets from EIS on MDP, the vertical curve means data packets dumped to ground station. So in general, known a raster's start and end time can calculate actual data volume, and then compare it with the designed data volume of this raster to get data compression rate.
At line 15 changed one line
3. prepare plots based on various factor combinations: compression factor vs. slit/slot, factor vs. target, factor vs. exposures
3. prepare plots based on various factor combinations: compression rate vs. slit/slot, rate vs. target, rate vs. exposures
At line 17 removed one line
\\
At line 19 removed one line
!!Some preliminary results (plots):
At line 21 removed one line
\\
At line 18 added one line
----
At line 24 changed 2 lines
''The investigation here is for date sets obtained mainly between %%(color:#cc0000;)2007-Sep-15 and 2007-Dec-15%%, as EIS operations were most efficient and stable over this duration. The other data sets inluded here are: %%(color:#cc0000;)2008-Mar%% (for JPEG85), %%(color:#cc0000;)2006-Dec%% (for JPEG75), %%(color:#cc0000;)2007-Jan to 2007-Apr%%, and %%(color:#cc0000;)2008-Feb%%.
''
Some preliminary results (plots):\\
At line 27 changed one line
\\
(The investigation here is for dates between %%(color:#cc0000;)2007-Sep-15 and 2007-Dec-15%%, as EIS is operationally stable over this duration.)
At line 30 removed one line
* [DPCM Compression Scheme]
At line 26 added 5 lines
%%tabbedSection
%%tab-DPCM
%%(text-align:center)
!DPCM compression (all samples)
%%
At line 33 changed one line
* [JPEG98 Compression Scheme]
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_only.gif}]
At line 34 added 3 lines
%%(text-align:center)
!DPCM compression vs different target
%%
At line 36 changed one line
* [JPEG95 Compression Scheme]
DPCM vs. QS
At line 40 added one line
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_QS_only.gif}]
At line 39 changed one line
* [JPEG90 Compression Scheme]
DPCM vs. AR
At line 44 added one line
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_AR_only.gif}]
At line 42 changed one line
* [JPEG85 Compression Scheme]
DPCM vs. CH
At line 48 added one line
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_CH_only.gif}]
At line 45 changed one line
* [JPEG75 Compression Scheme]
DPCM vs. PCH
At line 47 changed one line
\\
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_PCH_only.gif}]
At line 49 changed 2 lines
----
The __average values__ of compression factor for each scheme are listed in following %%(color:#c00;)Sortable Table%% (although only a single number can't show the compression factor varation over a large dataset).
DPCM vs. FIL
At line 52 changed 17 lines
%%sortable
|| Scheme || Total || QS || AR || CH || 1" || 2" || 40" || 266" || 10s || 15s || 20s || 30s || 60S
|DPCM |2.52|2.80|2.80|2.70|3.0|2.96|3.63|2.49|3.08|3.01|2.5|2.6|2.42
|DPCM | | | | | | | |QS|3.14|2.94|2.91|2.52|2.32
|DPCM | | | | | | | |AR|2.96|3.0|2.35|2.5|2.14
|DPCM | | | | | | | |CH| |3.05|2.52|2.88|2.47
|JPEG98|2.56|2.67|2.46|3.44|2.80|2.36|2.56| |3.21|2.54| |2.4|
|JPEG98| | | | | | | |QS|3.32|2.60| |2.43|
|JPEG98| | | | | | | |AR|3.17|2.42| |2.49|
|JPEG98| | | | | | | |CH|3.6| | | |
|JPEG95|6.25|6.12|6.38| |6.23|6.3| | |5.86| |4.60| |
|JPEG95| | | | | | | |AR|5.82| |4.08| |
|JPEG90|8.11|7.39|8.6|8.4|4.85| |5.04|8.34| | | |5.04|
|JPEG90| | | | | | | |QS| | | |3.87|
|JPEG90| | | | | | | |AR| | | |3.81|
|JPEG85|5.56|5.58|4.92|6.21| | |5.56| | | | | |
|JPEG75|11.39| | | | | | |11.39|11.39| | | |
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_FIL_only.gif}]
%%(text-align:center)
!DPCM compression vs SLA selection
At line 71 changed one line
However, the number shown above has difference from previous work done by others, eg, Hara'san result:
DPCM vs. 1" slit
At line 73 changed 12 lines
{{{
> 40" SLOT
> DPCM 2.36
> JPEG98 2.70
> JPEG95 3.47
> JPEG92 4.22
> JPEG90 4.63
> JPEG85 5.74
> JPEG75 7.63
> JPEG65 9.43
> JPEG50 12.0
> For 10s exposure time. }}}
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_1arcsec_only.gif}]
At line 86 changed one line
\\
DPCM vs. 2" slit
At line 88 changed one line
This work is just a start, the method and results shown here need to check again, and compare with other numbers. !As I mentioned above, these are only preliminary results on EIS compression factor. Still there are more need to be done, so any contributions, comments and suggestions are very helpful!\\
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_2arcsec_only.gif}]
At line 70 added one line
DPCM vs. 40" slit
At line 91 changed one line
----
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_1arcsec_only.gif}]
At line 74 added one line
DPCM vs. 266" slit
At line 94 changed 2 lines
%%information
As for target selection, in this case, I uses value of %%(color:#cc0000;)SCI_OBJ%% keyword instead of %%(color:#cc0000;)TARGET%% keyword as the later is only meaningful at (study/raster) design stage, the actual target is chosen during the EIS planning.
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_266arcsec_only.gif}]
At line 97 removed one line
However, sometimes there is no value for SCI_OBJ in EIS fits header, and sometimes there are two many values (see [SCI_OBJ_Example]). Lots of EIS dataset are thrwon away as hardly to decide to which catagroy the SCI_OBJ belongs to, such as QS,AR or CH.
At line 79 added 2 lines
%%(text-align:center)
!DPCM compression vs SLA selection vs target
At line 100 changed 2 lines
%%information
Compensation has been applied for those paused (and aborted) rasters. This is implemented by comparing %%(color:#cc0000;)NEXP%% and %%(color:#cc0000;)RAST_REQ%% and timing the ratio of two values.
DPCM vs. 1" slit vs. AR
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_AR_1arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 2" slit vs. AR
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_AR_2arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 40" slit vs. AR
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_AR_40arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 266" slit vs. AR
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_AR_266arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 1" slit vs. AR
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_AR_1arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 2" slit vs. AR
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_AR_2arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 40" slit vs. AR
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_AR_40arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 266" slit vs. AR
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_AR_266arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 1" slit vs. QS
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_QS_1arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 2" slit vs. QS
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_QS_2arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 40" slit vs. QS
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_QS_40arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 266" slit vs. QS
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_QS_266arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 1" slit vs. CH
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_CH_1arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 2" slit vs. CH
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_CH_2arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 40" slit vs. CH
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_CH_40arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 266" slit vs. CH
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_CH_266arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 1" slit vs. FIL
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_FIL_1arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 2" slit vs. FIL
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_FIL_2arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 40" slit vs. FIL
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_FIL_40arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 266" slit vs. FIL
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_FIL_266arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 1" slit vs. PCH
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_PCH_1arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 2" slit vs. PCH
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_PCH_2arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 40" slit vs. PCH
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_PCH_40arcsec_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 266" slit vs. PCH
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_PCH_266arcsec_only.gif}]
%%(text-align:center)
!DPCM compression vs different exposures
At line 103 removed 2 lines
%%information
There is a structure array to store all related information for the EIS data investigated here. The array has element with the following format:
At line 106 changed 22 lines
{{{
compFactor={compression_factor, $
study_ACR :'', $ ;string
study_id :'', $ ;string
rast_ACR :'', $ ;string
rast_id :'', $ ;string
ll_ACR :'',$ ;string
ll_id :'',$ ;string
start_time :'', $ ;string
end_time :'', $ ;string
fitsname :'',$ ;string
target :'',$ ;string
sci_obj :'',$ ;string
slit :'',$ ;string
def_volume :0LL,$ ;long64 int, unit: bits
mdp_volume :0.0,$ ;float, unit: kbits
comp_scheme :0,$ ;int
nexp :0,$ ;int
rast_req :0,$ ;int
exposures :fltarr(8) $ ;float, unit: sec
}
}}}
DPCM vs. 10 second
At line 129 changed one line
I attached an IDL sav file [here|https://vsolar.mssl.ucl.ac.uk/eiswiki/images/newgifs/20071201_20071215.sav.tar.gz]. You may download and play it, for example, I use:
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_10s_only.gif}]
At line 131 changed one line
{{{if (str1[i].SCI_OBJ eq 'QS') && (str1[i].COMP_SCHEME eq 1) && (str1[i].MDP_VOLUME gt 0.) then ind[i]=1}}}
DPCM vs. 15 second
At line 133 changed 2 lines
to extract records associated with 'QS' SCI_OBJ and using DPCM compression scheme.
----
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_15s_only.gif}]
At line 193 added 158 lines
DPCM vs. 20 second
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_20s_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 30 second
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_30s_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 60s second
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_60s_only.gif}]
%%(text-align:center)
!DPCM compression vs 1" SLA selection vs exposures
%%
DPCM vs. 1" slit vs. 10s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_1arcsec_10s_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 1" slit vs. 15s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_1arcsec_15s_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 1" slit vs. 20s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_1arcsec_20s_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 1" slit vs. 30s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_1arcsec_30s_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 1" slit vs. 60s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_1arcsec_60s_only.gif}]
%%(text-align:center)
!DPCM compression vs 2" SLA selection vs exposures
%%
DPCM vs. 2" slit vs. 10s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_2arcsec_10s_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 2" slit vs. 15s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_2arcsec_15s_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 2" slit vs. 20s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_2arcsec_20s_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 2" slit vs. 30s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_2arcsec_30s_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 2" slit vs. 60s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_2arcsec_60s_only.gif}]
%%(text-align:center)
!DPCM compression vs 40" SLA selection vs exposures
%%
DPCM vs. 40" slit vs. 10s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_40arcsec_10s_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 40" slit vs. 15s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_40arcsec_15s_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 40" slit vs. 20s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_40arcsec_20s_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 40" slit vs. 30s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_40arcsec_30s_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 40" slit vs. 60s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_40arcsec_60s_only.gif}]
%%(text-align:center)
!DPCM compression vs 266" SLA selection vs exposures
%%
DPCM vs. 266" slit vs. 10s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_266arcsec_10s_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 266" slit vs. 15s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_266arcsec_15s_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 266" slit vs. 20s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_266arcsec_20s_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 266" slit vs. 30s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_266arcsec_30s_only.gif}]
DPCM vs. 266" slit vs. 60s exposures
[{Image src='images/factor/dpcm/DPCM_266arcsec_60s_only.gif}]
%%
%%tab-SecondTab
This is the second tab
%%
%%tab-ThirdTab
This is the third tab
%%
%%
[{Image src='images/factor/75/JPEG75_only.gif'}]
QS QS,DC QS,SYN QS,CH QS,NET QS,DC,XBP QS,SYN,DC QS,DC,SEI QS,PCH
XBP,QS
AR AR,LMB AR,EFR AR,PLG AR,CH AR,NFL AR,CH,LMB
SYN SYN,DC SYN,QS,DC
PCH PCH,LMB,JET PCH,JET
JET,LMB,PCH
LMB LMB,LO LMB,PCH,SPI LMB,SPI
ENG,LMB,JET,PCH ENG,QS,DC
SYN,DC,QS SYN,DC
CH CH,JET CH,XBP CH,DC CH,LMB CH,QS CH,XBP,JET,EFR CH,BP,JET
PR PR,LMB PP,PCH
SPI,LMB
EFR SEI,EFR
DC DC,LMB WAV NET
SPI SPI,CH
BP,CH,JET BP,JET
FIL,PR FIL,QS
This page (revision-43) was last changed on 18-Apr-2021 19:03 by JianSunTop