This page (revision-13) was last changed on 07-Dec-2016 14:14 by Peter Young

This page was created on 23-Oct-2014 18:27 by Peter Young

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
13 07-Dec-2016 14:14 5 KB Peter Young to previous
12 04-Nov-2014 16:10 4 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
11 04-Nov-2014 16:09 4 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
10 30-Oct-2014 19:44 3 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
9 30-Oct-2014 19:42 3 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
8 29-Oct-2014 17:16 3 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
7 27-Oct-2014 18:59 3 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
6 27-Oct-2014 18:47 2 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
5 27-Oct-2014 18:42 2 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
4 27-Oct-2014 13:43 2 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
3 24-Oct-2014 20:28 1 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
2 23-Oct-2014 18:44 1 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
1 23-Oct-2014 18:27 803 bytes Peter Young to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links
AR12192obs
AR12192obs

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 1 removed 2 lines
[{ALLOW edit EISMainUsers}]
[{ALLOW view Anonymous}]
At line 7 removed 6 lines
!!18 October
!15:26-17:42, qub_hi-cad_flare_v2
42 rasters. There's a C4 flare at around 16:02, then a group of 3 C-flares together between 17:04 and 17:42. Raster 35 (17:22) shows a nice example of a completely blue-shifted Fe XXIV profile. Also seems to be a nice loop-top brightening in Ca XVII in this raster. All the flares are compact and nicely centered in the rasters.
At line 17 changed one line
42 rasters. A C5 flare peaks at 15:58 UT. The action occurs in the bottom-left corner of the rasters, where footpoints are seen. Raster 14 (15:49) shows nice blueshifts in Fe XXIV. There's also a very compact C2 flare at 17:05 that produces Fe XXIV.
Catches decay phase of C3 flare? Fe XXIV present.
At line 19 removed one line
At line 22 changed one line
!09:52-14:09, HH_flare_raster_v6
!09:52-?, HH_flare_raster_v6
At line 24 changed one line
Observes a number of small flares including a C4 at 11:27. Fe XXIV present including a number of transient loops. Doesn't seem to be any Fe XXIV blueshifts in this data-set, though.
Catches C4 flare at 11:27. Fe XXIV present, but no footpoints?
At line 38 changed one line
Should have caught M9 flare at 01:16 UT. Shows a skinny loop(s) that crosses the raster and can be seen cooling through the different emission lines. Fe XIV should give a good density estimate.
Should have caught M9 flare at 01:16 UT.
At line 44 changed one line
Caught X2 flare at 14:02 UT. Good data-set, with strong blue-shifts in Fe XXIV during impulsive phase.
Should have caught X2 flare at 14:02 UT.
At line 71 changed one line
M4 flare peaked at 07:37 UT, but data are no good. Don't see any footpoint emission, and only see fairly weak Fe XXIV loop crossing raster. Ca XV lines are too weak to use. Note that study had error, and windows aren't large enough for Fe XXIII and XXIV.
Should have caught M4 flare at 07:37 UT.
At line 78 changed one line
!12:05-15:11, HH_flare_raster_v6
!12:05-15:11, HPW002_QS_SAS_060m
At line 90 removed 2 lines
This caught rise phase of X5 flare, but peak at 21:40 is just missed.
At line 97 removed 96 lines
!10:33-17:28, HH_flare_raster_v6
Should have caught X1 flare (peak: 17:08). Note this is a double-peaked flare, and 2nd peak is missed.
!18:08-22:08, Flare266_Hunter02
No flare response.
!22:31-05:37, HH_flare_raster_v6
!!26 October
!06:11-10:11, Flare266_Hunter02
No flare response.
!10:14-17:39, HH_flare_raster_v6
Should have caught X3 flare (peak: 10:56).
!17:56-21:55, Flare266_Hunter02
!21:58-05:58, HH_flare_raster_v6
Should have caught M8 flare (peak: 00:34).
!!27 October
!06:13-10:13, Flare266_Hunter02
No flare response.
!10:15-17:59, HH_flare_raster_v6
Should have observed X3 flare (peak around 14:45).
!18:13-22:13, Flare266_Hunter02
No flare response.
!22:13-02:13, Flare266_Hunter02
Flare response began at 22:19 (6 rasters).
!!28 October
The XRT flag was being used with Flare266_Hunter02 on 28-29 October. Several of the studies triggered almost immediately (in fact it seems the hunter study didn't even run).
!02:14-06:14, Flare266_Hunter02
Flare response began at 02:54 (6 rasters).
!06:31-08:14, HH_flare_raster_v6
!10:43-14:42, Flare266_Hunter02
Flare response at 10:43 (6 rasters). The trigger doesn't seem to have worked, but the raster did catch a C7 flare at 11:05. Pointing not ideal, though,
!14:45-17:45, Flare266_Hunter02
Flare response at 14:45 (6 rasters). Caught late decay phase of M2 flare (peak 14:05). Flare loop seems to be visible at bottom of raster in Ca XVII. Pointing is bad.
!18:17-22:17, Flare266_Hunter02
Flare response at 18:17 (6 rasters). There is no significant flare that could have caused this trigger. Pointing is very similar to previous two response studies.
!22:19-02:19, Flare266_Hunter02
Flare response at 22:54 (6 rasters). Again, no significant flare had occurred. Pointing is same as previous studies.
!!29 October
!02:21-04:21, Flare266_Hunter02
Flare response at 03:30 (6 rasters). This seems to have worked well. Response started during rise of C9 flare. Rise is slow with three peaks. However, pointing is still bad (looks to be same as previous response studies).
!04:38-08:38, Flare266_Hunter02
Flare response at 04:38 (6 rasters).
!08:40-12:40, Flare266_Hunter02
Flare response at 08:40 (6 rasters).
!12:42-17:42, Flare266_Hunter02
No flare response.
!17:44-22:43, Flare266_Hunter02
No flare response.
!23:08-05:59, HH_flare_raster_v6
!06:13-08:07, HH_flare_raster_v6
This page (revision-13) was last changed on 07-Dec-2016 14:14 by Peter YoungTop