This page (revision-13) was last changed on 07-Dec-2016 14:14 by Peter Young

This page was created on 23-Oct-2014 18:27 by Peter Young

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
13 07-Dec-2016 14:14 5 KB Peter Young to previous
12 04-Nov-2014 16:10 4 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
11 04-Nov-2014 16:09 4 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
10 30-Oct-2014 19:44 3 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
9 30-Oct-2014 19:42 3 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
8 29-Oct-2014 17:16 3 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
7 27-Oct-2014 18:59 3 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
6 27-Oct-2014 18:47 2 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
5 27-Oct-2014 18:42 2 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
4 27-Oct-2014 13:43 2 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
3 24-Oct-2014 20:28 1 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
2 23-Oct-2014 18:44 1 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
1 23-Oct-2014 18:27 803 bytes Peter Young to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links
AR12192obs
AR12192obs

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 1 added 2 lines
[{ALLOW edit EISMainUsers}]
[{ALLOW view Anonymous}]
At line 15 changed one line
Catches decay phase of C3 flare? Fe XXIV present.
42 rasters. A C5 flare peaks at 15:58 UT. The action occurs in the bottom-left corner of the rasters, where footpoints are seen. Raster 14 (15:49) shows nice blueshifts in Fe XXIV. There's also a very compact C2 flare at 17:05 that produces Fe XXIV.
At line 19 added one line
At line 19 changed one line
!09:52-?, HH_flare_raster_v6
!09:52-14:09, HH_flare_raster_v6
At line 21 changed one line
Catches C4 flare at 11:27. Fe XXIV present, but no footpoints?
Observes a number of small flares including a C4 at 11:27. Fe XXIV present including a number of transient loops. Doesn't seem to be any Fe XXIV blueshifts in this data-set, though.
At line 35 changed one line
Should have caught M9 flare at 01:16 UT.
Should have caught M9 flare at 01:16 UT. Shows a skinny loop(s) that crosses the raster and can be seen cooling through the different emission lines. Fe XIV should give a good density estimate.
At line 41 changed one line
Should have caught X2 flare at 14:02 UT.
Caught X2 flare at 14:02 UT. Good data-set, with strong blue-shifts in Fe XXIV during impulsive phase.
At line 68 changed one line
Should have caught M4 flare at 07:37 UT.
M4 flare peaked at 07:37 UT, but data are no good. Don't see any footpoint emission, and only see fairly weak Fe XXIV loop crossing raster. Ca XV lines are too weak to use. Note that study had error, and windows aren't large enough for Fe XXIII and XXIV.
At line 75 changed one line
!12:05-15:11, HPW002_QS_SAS_060m
!12:05-15:11, HH_flare_raster_v6
At line 99 changed one line
!18:08-22:08, HH_flare_raster_v6
!18:08-22:08, Flare266_Hunter02
At line 104 added 2 lines
No flare response.
At line 112 added 2 lines
No flare response.
At line 128 added 2 lines
No flare response.
At line 136 added 2 lines
No flare response.
At line 140 added 2 lines
Flare response began at 22:19 (6 rasters).
At line 144 added 2 lines
The XRT flag was being used with Flare266_Hunter02 on 28-29 October. Several of the studies triggered almost immediately (in fact it seems the hunter study didn't even run).
At line 148 added 2 lines
Flare response began at 02:54 (6 rasters).
At line 151 added 42 lines
!10:43-14:42, Flare266_Hunter02
Flare response at 10:43 (6 rasters). The trigger doesn't seem to have worked, but the raster did catch a C7 flare at 11:05. Pointing not ideal, though,
!14:45-17:45, Flare266_Hunter02
Flare response at 14:45 (6 rasters). Caught late decay phase of M2 flare (peak 14:05). Flare loop seems to be visible at bottom of raster in Ca XVII. Pointing is bad.
!18:17-22:17, Flare266_Hunter02
Flare response at 18:17 (6 rasters). There is no significant flare that could have caused this trigger. Pointing is very similar to previous two response studies.
!22:19-02:19, Flare266_Hunter02
Flare response at 22:54 (6 rasters). Again, no significant flare had occurred. Pointing is same as previous studies.
!!29 October
!02:21-04:21, Flare266_Hunter02
Flare response at 03:30 (6 rasters). This seems to have worked well. Response started during rise of C9 flare. Rise is slow with three peaks. However, pointing is still bad (looks to be same as previous response studies).
!04:38-08:38, Flare266_Hunter02
Flare response at 04:38 (6 rasters).
!08:40-12:40, Flare266_Hunter02
Flare response at 08:40 (6 rasters).
!12:42-17:42, Flare266_Hunter02
No flare response.
!17:44-22:43, Flare266_Hunter02
No flare response.
!23:08-05:59, HH_flare_raster_v6
!06:13-08:07, HH_flare_raster_v6
This page (revision-13) was last changed on 07-Dec-2016 14:14 by Peter YoungTop